Upgrading controls without losing a production week.
Food plants cannot stop for a control system upgrade. The work has to fit into planned sanitation windows, and the cutover has to have a rollback position that actually works.
Food and beverage plants tend to run controls longer than other industries, partly because the process itself does not change and partly because downtime is so expensive that nobody volunteers to be the one who touched it. Eventually the processor becomes unsupportable and the decision makes itself.
The technical work, migrating from an SLC 500 or S7-300 onto current hardware, is well understood. The difficult part is scheduling, and preserving process knowledge that exists only inside undocumented ladder logic written by somebody who left years ago.
We work through the existing program before writing anything, documenting what each section actually does, and we agree the cutover window and rollback plan before touching production. CIP sequences, batch records and sanitation logging all get carried across deliberately rather than reproduced from memory.
How we protect production
- Existing logic documented before anything is rewritten
- Code written and simulated off site, tested against hardware first
- Cutover planned into an existing sanitation window
- Rollback position defined and tested before the changeover
- Operators trained on the new screens before go live
- Full documentation package: source, drawings, sequence, backups
What this involves.
Processor migration
SLC 500, PLC-5 and S7-300 onto current hardware, with the process logic preserved and documented.
CIP automation
Clean in place sequencing, verification and the records that prove a cycle ran as specified.
Batch & recipe control
Recipe management and batch tracking with validation that prevents the obvious operator mistakes.
When is your next sanitation window?
That usually determines the whole project schedule, so it is where we start planning.
Or call (801) 946-2710, Monday, Friday, 8:00am, 4:30pm MT